Evidence-led capability designPublic claims are labelled as verified, illustrative or pending validation.Open the evidence room →
AI, Data & Security Governance

Human accountability around intelligent systems.

A public framework for intended use, prohibited use, approval, validation, privacy, security, monitoring and incident response.

Control framework

Ten controls for responsible AI-enabled operations.

Actual system controls must be mapped, tested and evidenced per product or client environment.

01

Intended use

Define the approved business purpose, user, data, output and decision boundary before deployment.

02

Prohibited use

Do not use AI for unlawful discrimination, deceptive profiling, unauthorised surveillance, credential decisions without human review, or purposes outside approved scope.

03

Human approval

Require an accountable person for consequential hiring, compensation, employment, legal, financial, security and risk decisions.

04

Model validation

Test suitability, accuracy, robustness, failure modes and change impact against the intended context.

05

Bias testing

Evaluate outcomes and error patterns across relevant groups; investigate material disparities before use.

06

Explainability & uncertainty

Show rationale, source, confidence and material limitations; avoid precision that the evidence cannot support.

07

Data minimisation

Use only necessary data, with defined purpose, consent / lawful basis, retention, deletion and processor obligations.

08

Access & audit

Apply least privilege, role separation, secure identity, logging and traceability for sensitive data and material outputs.

09

Incident response

Maintain detection, containment, escalation, investigation, communication and regulatory reporting paths.

10

Vendor governance

Assess providers, models, subprocessors, data location, change notices, security, exit and evidence rights.

Decision gates

No production AI feature without an accountable release path.

These gates are a governance model; implementation evidence must be retained.

1Purpose approvedOwner and prohibited boundaries
2Data reviewedNecessity, access and retention
3Model validatedQuality, bias and failure modes
4Human control testedEscalation and override
5Release monitoredLogs, drift, incidents and review
Transparency statement

What this page does not claim.

Clikin Tech does not imply ISO 27001, SOC 1, SOC 2 or another certification unless a current certificate is explicitly published. This framework is not legal advice or a substitute for a system-specific security and privacy assessment.

Map this framework to an actual workflow.

Define purpose, data, model, human approval, audit and incident evidence before production use.