Founder pack
Approved education, professional credentials and three quantified career highlights for each founder, with a named evidence owner.
Evidence Room · Public trust register
Make every material claim traceable.
This page separates public facts, founder prior experience, illustrative concepts and evidence that still requires approval.
Public evidence register
What is supported now — and what remains a content dependency.
Updated 26 August 2026. This register is a website governance tool, not a legal assurance report.
| Claim / asset | Status | Current support | Publication treatment | Next action |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clikin Tech founded 2023 | Verified public profile | Company LinkedIn ↗ | Shown in proof band with source. | Annual review. |
| Bengaluru headquarters | Verified public profile | Company LinkedIn ↗ + existing site address | Shown with map link. | Confirm legal address before launch. |
| Legal entity name | Existing website | Royal 18 Global Tech Craft Pvt. Ltd. appears across the existing website and supplied logo. | Shown clearly in footer and contact verification. | Attach MCA / incorporation source and approve CIN publication. |
| Founder leadership profiles | Published | Roles, concise experience summaries, supplied photographs and public LinkedIn profiles are published for all three founders. | Profiles are limited to the experience and responsibilities supplied for publication. | Optional next step: add approved education, certifications and independently verifiable career highlights. |
| Case studies and outcomes | Missing evidence | No approved client outcome pack was supplied. | Only illustrative engagement blueprints are shown. | Approve three anonymised cases with timeframe, team, location and result. |
| Client logos / testimonials | Permission required | No written permissions supplied. | Not published. | Collect written permission and source record. |
| GCC market context | External source | NASSCOM FY2024 report ↗ and STPI publication ↗ | Reporting year shown beside every number. | Refresh as one edition at a time. |
| GCC Lab output | Illustrative | User selections and compatibility rules; no live market feed. | Qualitative band only, with methodology and uncertainty. | Commission evidence model before any validated ranking. |
| 3M Platform screens | Prototype | Concept demonstration created for workflow validation. | Every panel labelled “Prototype”. | Confirm feature maturity and replace with approved screenshots. |
| Workforce performance metrics | Missing evidence | No verified reporting pack supplied. | Metric definitions shown; values withheld. | Publish period, denominator, exclusions and owner. |
| AI / data / security controls | Framework | DPDP Act ↗, DPDP Rules ↗, CERT-In Directions ↗ | Governance principles stated; certifications not implied. | Map controls to actual products and operations. |
Required before enterprise launch
Close the highest-trust gaps in the right sequence.
Founder credibility → verified experience → cases → simulator methodology → screenshots → location evidence → governance → article authority.
Three case packs
Challenge, approach, technology, governance, timeframe, team size, location, outcome and evidence owner.
Product maturity
Approved screenshots, data sources, roles, actions, status and walkthrough recording.
Operational proof
Workforce funnel metrics, training cohort outcomes, client permission and testimonial source records.
Organisation verification
CIN / GST publication approval, office verification and company-page ownership.
Editorial ownership
Named article authors, reviewers, photos, bios, revision owner and source review cycle.
Have approved evidence ready?
Use the evidence intake structure to replace honest placeholders without changing the design system.